Skip to content
  • Home
  • About Me
  • Blog
  • Contacts
  • Home
  • About Me
  • Blog
  • Contacts
  • Home
  • About Me
  • Blog
  • Contacts
  • Home
  • About Me
  • Blog
  • Contacts

BrewUpErp

  • 1. The Brewery Domain
    • 1.1 Why Modular Monolith
    • 1.2 Repository Structure
    • 1.3 Bounded Contexts
    • 1.4 CQRS in BrewUp
    • 1.5 Event-Driven Architecture
  • 2. Governance
    • 2.1 Why Fitness Functions Matter
    • 2.2 Enforcing Module Boundaries
    • 2.3 Living Documentation
  • 3. Domain Modeling
    • 3.1 Aggregates
    • 3.2 Specification Tests
    • 3.3 Domain Events
  • 1. The Brewery Domain
    • 1.1 Why Modular Monolith
    • 1.2 Repository Structure
    • 1.3 Bounded Contexts
    • 1.4 CQRS in BrewUp
    • 1.5 Event-Driven Architecture
  • 2. Governance
    • 2.1 Why Fitness Functions Matter
    • 2.2 Enforcing Module Boundaries
    • 2.3 Living Documentation
  • 3. Domain Modeling
    • 3.1 Aggregates
    • 3.2 Specification Tests
    • 3.3 Domain Events

2.1 Why Fitness Functions Matter

This is where most modular monolith examples fail.

Explain:

* architectural erosion
* accidental coupling
* dependency drift
* semantic leakage between modules

Then introduce:

* ArchUnitNET
* NetArchTest
* custom Roslyn analyzers (if any)

Use real examples from BrewUp.

This section can become a reference article on modular governance.

info@albertoacerbis.com

Twitter Github Github Github Strava
  • 2026 Alberto Acerbis. All Rights Reserved
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Contacts
  • Credits
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Contacts
  • Credits
  • Italiano
  • English